Utopia of a multipolar world order: How Asia could break the dominance of the dollar

Essay The West's share of the world's social product is now only about one-third. The time is ripe for Asia and the Global South to break the dominance of the dollar and introduce their own currency unions à la the eurozone

by Mohssen Massarrat

[This article posted on 8/12/2024 is translated from the German on the Internet, https://www.freitag.de/autoren/der-freitag/multipolare-weltordnung-warum-asien-eine-waehrungsunion-wie-den-euro-braucht/8737043a-f147-44db-8297-5b8c990d898e.]

If India and China were to join forces, they would merge into a gigantic economic power

The US-dominated unipolar world order has been crumbling ever since the People's Republic of China rose to become a new world power. In any case, the share of the Western world's economic output has declined significantly in recent decades, and its share of the world's social product is now only 32 to 40 percent, depending on the method of calculation. However, the road to a new world order free of hegemony is long and it is likely to be very bumpy. The USA and the West still dominate the global economy by a wide margin: over 60 percent of international trade is currently conducted in dollars. The USA in particular benefits from this financial system. The unbalanced financial system provides effective support and a complement to the neo-colonialist global division of labor. It cements the unequal global distribution of resources and income.

There is no doubt that the vast majority of states in the Global South will support the transition to a multipolar world order. The People's Republic of China is indisputably the main protagonist on the road to overcoming the unipolar world. China's Silk Road project, the emergence of BRICS states and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization are important initiatives in this direction. The interest of numerous states in the Global South in these initiatives reflects the desire of these states to break free from their dependence on the United States and the West as a whole, thereby increasing their own national scope for action.
These states are understandably looking for alternative options for global cooperation in order to be able to defend their national sovereignty more effectively. But what would a multipolar world look like? And what would be the decisive steps on the way to such a world order?

We are facing an "Asian century"
The founding of the Asian Union would be the first step in this direction.
The idea of growing together in Asia is as old as the modern history of the anti-colonial dependence of the two large Asian nations of China and India. Many commentaries in China today speak of China and India jointly ushering in an Asian century. "If India's strategic independence withstands any external pressure," writes Asia expert Stephan Ossenkopp, "no wedge will be driven between the two Asian giants. A peacefully coexisting China-India tandem would thus guarantee stability throughout Asia."
In fact, the former Chinese President Deng Xiaoping is said to have used the term "Asian century" as early as 1988 during his meeting with his Indian counterpart Rajiv Gandhi. Today, the Indian Foreign Minister, Subramanian Jaishankar, is also using this term again.
In 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited India, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reciprocated the visit the following year. Was this a further step towards a harmonious coexistence?
The creation of an Asian economic community, in the long term the Asian Union, would be an attractive option, analogous to the European Union, for coping with the enormous task of a multipolar world.

Asian Economic Community, Asian Union? Yes, why not? Over 75 percent of the world's oil and gas resources are located in Asia. Asia exports over 90 percent of these energy sources and thus has a virtual monopoly on global energy supply, including the energy supply of the Global North, for the next three to four decades, which is the time remaining until the final exit from the fossil path. The importance of fossil resources in Asia alone makes it a good idea to create a pan-Asian currency to handle global trade in oil and gas with its own currency. It is one of the greatest paradoxes of world history that a continent like Asia has to place itself in the total and sometimes even extortionate dependence of the currency of a state on the American continent in order to market its natural wealth.

What speaks in favor of a pan-Asian currency

Asia is not only rich in fossil resources, whose time is irrevocably coming to an end in view of the climate crisis. Asia is also rich in all other resources, especially resources such as rare earths, such as bauxite, which are needed for a transformation to a carbon-free global economy. From this point of view, Asia would therefore have a solid economic reason to conduct global trade in all its resources on the basis of its own currency. In this respect, an Asian economic community with its own currency would correspond to the efforts of the BRICS countries to roll back the dollar monopoly and even give them a massive boost. Because, apart from the powerful financial institutions, these BRICS efforts have so far lacked the material basis for an alternative to the dollar.
More articles on the topic

The green cloak of neoliberalism: How poor countries are prevented from becoming sustainable

With the Inflation Reduction Act, the United States is pumping tens of billions of dollars into its domestic industry to usher in the green transition. Why do our international trade rules prevent poor countries from taking the same path?
By Laura Carvalho

Peace plan: China wants a multipolar world beyond hegemonies

The peace plan of the government in Beijing contains not only fundamental positions but also diplomatic material that should be incorporated into the negotiations for peace. It is also clear that China is already thinking about tomorrow's world
By Lutz Herden

China wants to give the welfare state more importance

The July meeting of the Chinese party leadership has decided on the long overdue tax and financial reform. Private consumption is also to be strengthened, in line with the already decided move away from one-sided export-oriented growth
By Michael Krätke

The US currency also became established not only as a result of the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944, but ultimately also because the USA had developed into the largest trading and financial power after the Second World War. In 1971, US President Richard Nixon even had to terminate the Bretton Woods Agreement in order to free the dollar from the restrictions imposed by the gold standard. The dollar only reached its functional peak as a world currency when global oil trading was conducted in dollars and oil trading effectively ensured the dollar's stability.
The history of the dollar's development shows that it is not possible to conjure up a new world currency overnight through mere political agreements.
Although the People's Republic of China is likely to become the world's dominant trading power in the near future, the yuan would still be a long way from becoming a world currency. Major oil and gas exporters, as well as exporters of other commodities, would have to abandon the dollar as the trading currency for their commodity exports and switch to a new world currency – let's call it ASEAN.
Hope for a better future

The new Asian currency cannot, of course, be a country's existing currency. Imagine the resentment that would have arisen in Germany if a new currency had been introduced for the EU and the German mark had been proposed as the new currency, because Germany's share of European trade volume was the highest. For this reason alone, the opponents of the EU would probably have successfully prevented the euro.

The People's Republic of China is developing numerous initiatives, all of which are characterized by the spirit of overcoming division and contributing to the structural networking of Asian countries and the Global South. These include China's Silk Road project, which extends far beyond Asia in terms of economic and political networking. These also include the initiative to bring the hostile states of Iran and Saudi Arabia closer together in 2023, which led to a renewed exchange of ambassadors, and the initiative to form a Palestinian transitional government with the participation of 14 political groups, including Fatah and Hamas, in the summer of 2024.

Change the world with good arguments.

There is no question that such a policy of bringing peoples and states together from the bottom up, in small steps, represents a peaceful alternative to the neo-colonialist policies of the West, which systematically tend to divide peoples and states and sow discord between them (as has been successfully practiced in Palestine for several decades, for example) or to fuel an arms race between them (as occurred between Iran and Saudi Arabia in the first decades of this century). Such an externally fueled arms race also took place in the second half of the 1970s, which in 1980 led to the eight-year war between Iran and Iraq with dramatic consequences for both countries.
If Japan joins, the Asian Union would be unbeatable
Implementing the ASEAN currency would be a gigantic task.
The main barrier would be to win the approval of those Asian states that are still economically quite strongly interwoven with the dollar zone. These include, of all things, the Arab oil states on the Persian Gulf, which currently represent the backbone of the oil trade in dollars. In all likelihood, the USA would use all the means at its disposal (including regime changes in the aforementioned states) to prevent these states from joining the Asian monetary union.

Given the current rather diverse economic characteristics of the member states of the Asian Economic Community (productivity levels, inflation rates, industrialization and debt levels), a multi-stage process seems appropriate from today's perspective, the phases and steps of which could be roughly as follows.
First: the establishment of the Asian Economic Community by willing and strategically and geopolitically important Asian states, which would have to form the backbone of the union.
These states include the People's Republic of China, India, Russia, Indonesia, Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. The European Union was not created overnight either. Its foundation in 1999 was preceded by sectoral cooperation between six important European states and the founding of the so-called "Coal and Steel Union" as early as 1951.

Secondly: the accession of the remaining Asian states.

Thirdly, the immediate introduction of the "ASEAN", initially exclusively as a currency for the member states' trade in raw materials.

Fourthly, the introduction of a monetary union, which the member states join provided they have fulfilled the agreed criteria for accession.
Even without Japan, the Asian Union would be by far the largest economic, energy and resource power in the world, with over half the world's population. With Japan, its power would be unsurpassable.
The process of creating the Asian Union alone is likely to noticeably shake the global balance of power and make the populations of all continents aware that the time has come to prioritize cooperation in all regions and continents, to create their own continental economic community with its own currency and to emancipate themselves from the monopolistic dictates of the dollar, the only global currency.

What Europe must do when the dominance of the dollar crumbles
The EU states and the European Central Bank would then have the option of gradually bringing their dollar reserves onto the currency markets, reducing the dollar's value to a level that reflects the real strength of the US economy, and establishing the euro as a new world currency.
In this perspective, the UK would have to shelve its role as the US's assistant sheriff, finally abandon its colonial and neo-colonial ambitions and reverse its spectacularly failed Brexit.

The US would gradually lose its monopoly position in the world financial system and its ability to finance its armaments and hegemonic wars at the expense of the rest of the world through the unchecked influx of capital from around the world into the dollar zone. It would have to significantly reduce its four percent defense budget and start financing it primarily through taxes.

In the event of such a development, which is presented here in a very optimistic light, it can be assumed that African states would not sit back and do nothing, but would proactively push ahead with the creation of the African Union with its own currency, in parallel with the rest of the world.

A world made up of the European Union, the Asian Union, the African Union and the American Union, each with its own currency, would be more peaceful, democratic and sustainable than the current US-dominated world. However, such a world order would not solve all of humanity's problems by a long shot. However, it would provide a more effective framework for dealing with the consequences of climate change and hunger, as well as for the fairer use of unequally distributed natural resources.

Mohssen Massarrat was born in Iran in 1942. Before he retired in 2008, he taught social sciences at the University of Osnabrück. In 2017, he published Does the World Need the Financial Sector? at VSA-Verlag (304 pages, €24.80).
___________________________________________________________________________

also see: Eric Maskin: China has achieved great success in the last 40 years
The 2nd International Conference on Basic Sciences was held in Beijing. During the conference, a CMG journalist interviewed Nobel Prize winner in Economics Eric Maskin, who attended the conference.
In the interview, Maskin said that the gap between politics and economics is growing worldwide. Science unites everyone because it is by nature something that needs to be united. This conference brings together scientists from different countries, which is particularly important.
Eric Maskin added that the Chinese development experience is worth studying by other countries.

Source: CRI online

Christian Reimann's comment: Interesting. In the same period, Germany has suffered numerous failures. Unlike the rest of the world, Germany – and the EU – has imposed a debt brake that prevents important investments – e.g. in education & science, health, infrastructure and statutory pensions.


No comments:

Post a Comment