The negligible rest
The USA is sticking to its unipolar claim and pursuing a long-term strategy to marginalize all other countries.
Most
countries do not dare to openly pursue world domination. Except the
USA. In their language, they simply call it "global leadership", which
sounds a little milder. The "only indispensable nation" (Barack Obama)
is increasingly allowing itself to flex its muscles against the
dispensable, including us Germans. As
recently as July 2024, Joe Biden, the future ex-president of the USA,
was able to declare openly: "I rule the world." Those who attribute this
to the darkening state of consciousness of an elderly gentleman are
making it too easy for themselves. Arrogance is part of the political
DNA of "God's own country". For many in this very religious country,
acting as a teacher of democracy and ruler of the world is a divine
mission. The
USA has also called itself the "land of the free". For the rest of the
world, which the global hegemon is increasingly leading by the hand,
there is not much freedom left. The author's historical review also
shows what part the submissive attitude of countries like Germany has
played in the misery.
by Wolfgang Bittner
[This
article posted on 8/2/2024 is translated from the German on the
Internet, https://www.manova.news/artikel/der-vernachlassigbare-rest.]
In
the opinion of its power elites, the United States of America is "the
land of the free and the home of the brave", as the national anthem
proclaims. And "God's Own Country" is destined to rule the world. To
enforce this unipolar claim, they have developed a long-term strategy
since the 19th century, which includes maintaining an excessively
well-equipped army and establishing about 1,000 military bases around
the world.
It cannot be overlooked that large parts of US society, including Congress, are fanatically religious and fundamentalist. The
affinity between Puritanism and capitalism, an "economic doctrine of
predestination" — if God loves you, he will make you rich — is deeply
rooted here to this day. Furthermore, many of the hardliners apparently
believe that everything that benefits the USA ultimately benefits the
whole world, which is the basis for their claim to global supremacy.
Continuity for more than 200 years
This
unjustified hubris was also followed by the policies of President
Barack Obama, who came along with a winning smile, waged seven wars and,
in a speech at the military academy in West Point, described the United
States as the "only indispensable nation", the linchpin of all
alliances from Europe to Asia, "unparalleled in the history of nations."
(1)
In
doing so, Obama was stating what had long been the policy of the United
States, which since the 20th century had also been able to assert its
imperial claim against Europe, in particular Germany.
This
power politics had its beginnings in 1823 at the latest, when President
James Monroe presented the US Congress with the basic outlines of a
long-term foreign policy for the United States: no tolerance of
interference by other countries on the American continent, while at the
same time the USA claimed the right to protect and intervene in Latin
America (2). In doing so, the USA laid its hands on Central and South
America.
In
1904, Theodore Roosevelt (1858–1919, President 1901–1909) authorized
the USA to exercise "international police power" and to uncompromisingly
enforce economic and strategic interests. His motto was: "Speak softly
and carry a big stick, and you will get far." (3)
After all the treaties with the Native Americans had been broken and
the last devastating battle had been fought at Wounded Knee in 1890,
this applied primarily to the Latin American countries in the "backyard
of the USA", but also to Morocco and Korea, and a little later to the
rest of the world.
This was fully in line with a statement by the next president, Woodrow Wilson:
"Since
commerce knows no national boundaries and the entrepreneur claims the
world as his market, the flag of his nation must follow him and the
closed doors of nations must be broken open. (...) The concessions
acquired by financiers must be guaranteed by the ministers of state,
even if the sovereignty of recalcitrant nations is thereby violated."
(4)
Barack Obama put it this way in an interview with the US TV channel Vox on February 11, 2016:
"We occasionally have to twist the arm of countries that don't do what we want them to do. If
it were not for the various economic or diplomatic or, in some cases,
military means of pressure that we have, if we did not have this dose of
realism, we would not get anything done either (...) the American
leadership comes partly from our hands-on mentality. We are the largest,
most powerful country on earth (...) we have no equal in terms of
states that could attack or provoke the United States." (5)
The influence of the world's number one power
The
USA finally achieved its goal of becoming the world's number one power
after the Second World War, when President Harry S. Truman announced to
both houses of Congress on March 12, 1947:
"I believe that it must be
the policy of the United States to support free peoples who resist the
subjugation imposed upon them by armed minorities or by foreign
pressures. I
believe that we must help all free peoples to determine their own
destiny in their own way. (...) In helping free and independent nations
to maintain their freedom, the United States is realizing the principles
of the United Nations. The free peoples of the world are counting on
our support in their struggle for freedom. If we falter in our
leadership role, we endanger the peace of the world – and we certainly
harm the welfare of our own nation." (6)
According
to Truman's altruistic words, this "support" of free peoples by the USA
should include "above all economic and financial assistance", "which
forms the basis for economic stability and orderly political
conditions", but realpolitik went the usual way in the interests and to
the advantage of the USA and mostly at the expense and to the
disadvantage of the "free peoples", as a look at history up to the
present day proves (7).
The
journalist Werner Rügemer has analyzed the influence and influence of
the USA on the European, and in particular the German economy, and comes
to startling conclusions:
Russia
has no place in the economic and military strategy of the United
States. The former director of the influential think tank Stratfor,
George Friedman, made a remarkable statement about this egocentric,
peace-endangering policy in his speech at the Chicago Council on Global
Affairs on February 4, 2015:
"The
main interest of US foreign policy during the last century, in the
First and Second World Wars and in the Cold War, was the relationship
between Germany and Russia. Because together they are the only power
that can threaten our supremacy. Our main goal was to ensure that this
did not happen." (9)
Friedman explains why this policy has been continued to the present day as follows:
"The
main concern of the United States is that (...) German capital and
German technology combine with Russian raw materials and Russian labor
to form a unique combination that the United States has been trying to
prevent for a century. So how can we achieve this, that this
German-Russian combination is prevented? The
USA is prepared to use its card to beat this combination: that is the
line between the Baltic and the Black Sea. (...) The point of the whole
thing is that the USA is building a 'cordon sanitaire', a security belt,
around Russia."
This has basically been worked on consistently in secret since the Franco-Prussian War of 1871.
Friedman goes on to say:
"The
United States controls all the oceans of the world out of its
fundamental interest. No other power has ever done that. That is why we
intervene in the peoples of the world, but they cannot attack us."
Many peoples are also unable to defend themselves, as has been shown recently. Those who oppose them are ruined or bombed.
Friedman's
"confession" only caused a stir in the so-called alternative media. The
same applies to the statements of Zbigniew Brzezinski, who saw Eurasia
as the "chessboard of the USA", on which it made its moves in the
struggle for global supremacy. In his book "The Grand Chessboard:
American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives", in which he
developed the geopolitical strategy of the USA after the fall of the
Soviet Union, Brzezinski wrote:
"The
extent to which the United States can assert its global supremacy
depends on how a globally engaged America deals with the complex power
relations on the Eurasian continent – and whether it can prevent the
emergence of a dominant, opposing power there." (10)
Henry
Kissinger's statement of February 2, 2014, should also be seen in this
context, according to which the regime change in Kiev is, so to speak,
the dress rehearsal for "what we want to do in Moscow". (11)
Joseph Biden: "I rule the world"
President
Joseph Biden demonstrated the self-image of the US government in an
interview with the US broadcaster ABC on July 6, 2024, when he was asked
about his physical and mental condition after a disastrous election
campaign duel with Donald Trump. He explained in front of the camera:
"I
take a cognitive test every day. You know, I'm not just campaigning,
I'm governing the world. It sounds like an exaggeration, but we are the
most important nation in the world." (12)
This statement was accepted
by Western politicians and journalists with almost no comment, which in
turn allows conclusions to be drawn about the depravity of these
actors.
In
a speech at the Harvard Kennedy School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on
October 2, 2014, Biden, who was still US Vice President at the time,
boasted:
"We gave Putin a simple choice: respect Ukraine's
sovereignty or face increasing consequences. This allowed us to get the
world's largest developed nations to impose real costs on Russia. It
is true that they (the EU) did not want to do that. But again, it was
America's leadership and the fact that the President of the United
States insisted, yes, had to embarrass Europe on many occasions to force
it to get up and take economic hits to be able to impose costs (on
Russia). And
the consequences were a massive flight of capital from Russia, a
virtual freeze on foreign direct investment, the ruble at an all-time
low against the dollar and the Russian economy on the brink of
recession." (13)
The
fact that the Berlin government has continued to follow this policy,
which is diametrically opposed to German interests, to the present day,
as can be seen from statements by Olaf Scholz, Robert Habeck and
Annalena Baerbock, is a disgrace and cannot be explained solely by
Germany's lack of sovereignty.
The
statements of US leaders, repeated over more than a century, paint a
picture of the US's monopolar imperial policy, which the former chief of
staff of US Secretary of State Colin Powell, Lawrence Wilkerson,
characterized with the words:
"To hell with the rest of the world." (14)
Editorial note: This text was first published under the title "'To hell with the rest of the world' — Long-term strategy and unipolar claim of the USA" at NachDenkSeiten
(1) www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/05/28/remarks-president-united-states-military-academy-commencement-ceremony
(2) The so-called Monroe Doctrine. See also: https://amerika21.de/analyse/239008/monroe-doktrin-totgesagte-leben-laenger
(3)
See Theodore Roosevelt: The strenuous Life. Essays and Addresses, New
York 1906, and Theodore Roosevelt typed letter signed as governor of New
York, January 26, 1900,
https://historical.ha.com/itm/autographs/u.s.-presidents/theodore-roosevelt-typ
ed-letter-signed-as-governor-of-new-york-two-pages-9-x-115-albany-new-york-january-26-190/a/6054-34087.s
(4) as Wilfried Röhrich: Politik als Wissenschaft — Ein Überblick, Opladen 1986
(5)
as RT Deutsch, February 12, 2015,
https://deutsch.rt.com/11745/international/obamas-diplomatie-verstaendnis-wir-muessen-gewalt-anwenden-wenn-laender-nicht-das-machen-was-wir-wollen/.
See also: der Freitag, 15 February 2015, www.freitag.de/autoren/hans-springstein/der-us-praesident-hat-wieder-klartext-geredet
(6)
The so-called Truman Doctrine, as described by Manfred Görtemaker,
among others: Das Ende des Ost-West-Konflikts? (The End of the East-West
Conflict?), page 58
(7) At the end of the 1940s, the USA withdrew a
large part of its troops from Germany to deploy them in the Korean War
in 1950, in which around four million people died and the country was
divided.
(8)
Werner Rügemer: Die Wahrheit ist auf unserer Seite, Neue Rheinische
Zeitung Online, November 21, 2018,
www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=25399
(9) AntikriegTV: US-Strategie, YouTube, March 17, 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=vln_ApfoFgw
(10) Zbigniew Brzezinski: The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York 2003, page 15
(11) www.nrhz.de/flyer/beitrag.php?id=20079
(12)
www.n-tv.de/politik/Widerstand-bei-Demokraten-gegen-Kandidatur-formiert-sich-US-Praesident-Biden-ballt-die-Faust-und-gibt-skurriles-Interview-article25067731.html
(13)
newscan, Zeitdokument: Wir zwangen die EU zu Sanktionen gegen Russland,
January 5, 2015, www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLO7uKVarB8
(14) Florian Linse, NachDenkSeiten, August 8, 2018, www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=45368
Wolfgang
Bittner, born in 1941, grew up in East Frisia and lives as a freelance
writer in Göttingen. After graduating from high school, he studied law,
sociology and philosophy in Göttingen and Munich. Until 1974, he pursued
various professional and gainful activities, including as a welfare
officer, administrative officer and lawyer. Extensive
travels took him to the Middle East, Mexico, Canada and New Zealand. He
writes for adults, young people and children, has been translated into
numerous languages and has received several literary awards. He has
worked for newspapers, magazines, radio and television and sat on the
WDR Broadcasting Council from 1996 to 1998. He has taught in Germany and
abroad.
Related article
Make love, not war
No comments:
Post a Comment