Around the mountain
Capitalism has reached its natural limits and is now beginning to collapse under its own weight.
While
the super-rich, corporations, financial monopolies and stock exchanges
have long since freed themselves from the straitjacket of the state, the
European elections have made it clear that there is a cross-party
consensus in favor of capitalism and the certainty that the era of
nation states is over. In
the European Union (EU), the course has been set for a bipolar order of
a feudal character, which is also gaining ground worldwide. But this is
not the end of history, but rather a part of the beginning.
by Gunther Sosna
[This
article posted on 6/29/2024 is translated from the German on the
Internet, https://www.manova.news/artikel/um-den-berg-herum.]
Financial
capital is beyond control and social responsibility. It has no enemies
to fear, it operates globally, marauding around the globe and leaving
scorched earth in its wake. In Germany, too, no political force is
blocking its path. Parties, people and nation are united under the
banner of capital with its pharmaceutical-ecological purity and an
overwhelming virtue that can be used to justify even the most obvious
social injustices and wars.
Roadmap
In
the face of the outsourcing, downsizing and dissolution of the
remaining industry, the overproduction driven by automation, robotics
and competition at the international level, and the artificial
intelligence (AI) that is penetrating the service sector, a debate on
the future of gainful employment and the distribution of the wealth
created by machines is overdue. A political left would have to push it.
But it has reconciled itself with capital.
The
total collapse of the capitalist opponent at the beginning of the 1990s
has prevented a fundamental discussion about the future viability of
the economic system, which in its global form has led to an astronomical
level of debt for states, an unprecedented concentration of capital
power in private hands and, as a result, to an already unprecedented
pauperization in the global south and parts of the north. It will be massively accelerated by digitization, which is destroying entire industries.
In
Germany, compulsory military service would be just the thing to collect
young people — before they come up with socially revolutionary ideas —
who face a lack of career prospects in a world of work that is becoming
increasingly specialized.
The portrayal of capitalism as the best and
therefore only economic solution, which has been haunting Europe since
the post-war period, has become the general party doctrine — with all
the social consequences that entails. This includes the centralization
of power. In
the EU, the nation states have surrendered their decision-making
sovereignty. The relevant political decisions have long since been taken
in Brussels and are only implemented at the national level. At the same
time, the old state is working to transfer the illusion of an
individualized national community, which is cobbled together from
competing classes, to a no less artificial European "we".
In
order to secure the capital caravan that is transforming the EU into an
ecologically pure, socially deprived and militarily aggressive USA 2.0,
the state, with the help of media corporations and the broadcasting
organizations it controls, is pursuing its destiny as an organ of
repression. Protest
is modeled in the interests of capital, social counter-models are
discredited, resistance is neutralized, the classes are incited against
each other as needed, and systemic responsibility for social upheavals
is airbrushed out. A
parliamentary opposition exists only on paper: everyone represents the
shrinking middle class and no one the growing underclass. The latter is
only good as a scapegoat for "necessary" labor market reforms, based on
the malicious insinuations of a political caste that is disconnected
from the realities of life, feeds itself from the state treasury and
recommends to the people that they turn off the heating as costs rise.
Right and left
Right-wing
ideologies, which are supposedly being opposed, are part of the
national and European DNA. Let us not forget: the French Revolution of
1789 gave rise to the division of political camps into "left" and
"right". The seating arrangement in the National Assembly determined
that the aristocratic and conservative citizens sat on the right and the
revolutionary and progressive deputies on the left. This
arrangement became the standard for categorizing political differences
in Europe. Such differences are no longer recognizable today. There is
no system conflict in the parliaments. The left flank has been swept
clean and everything has shifted to the right. Capitalism is revered
like a sacred cow, which prepares the destruction of the welfare state
and opens the door to fascism.
Its
ramifications are intertwined with Germany and the European idea from a
national perspective, including the integration of the Federal Republic
of Germany (FRG) into the West, the toleration of National Socialists
in the organizational superstructure of the FRG's brand-new
representative democracy, the post-war anti-communism, the satisfaction
of industrial interests through the supran supranational
European Coal and Steel Community, known as the Montanunion, the
unquestioning allegiance to the USA, which was geared towards greed for
profit and maximum exploitation, and the successful endeavor to make
fascism in the Bonn Republic touchable — are intertwined with Germany
and the European idea.
In
West Germany, the revolutionary left, which manifested itself as a
student movement with its anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist
positions, was fought at all levels, its breeding ground was integrated
into the nation at the end of the 1970s, and the critical reappraisal of
National Socialism that was demanded was shelved. In
the right-wing-leaning social center, political neutralization took
place; in green capitalism, which was inflated into a moralizing
substitute religion with its wind turbines, digital wonder bags and
biological apocalyptic fantasies, it has been dissolved. At most,
contradiction is heard behind closed doors.
After
the German Democratic Republic (GDR) joined the Federal Republic of
Germany (FRG), the identity of the "Ossis" was eroded and their
historically significant role as a bulwark against imperialism was
obliterated. The country and its people were left to the ravenous
financial locusts from the West and politically to the new right. The
latter, for lack of answers to questions about the future, is fleeing
into the past, which is infinitely more appealing to capital than any
Marxist-tinged utopia. The remnants of the left were ground between the
parliamentary millstones of compromise in Berlin in their quest for
governability.
The anti-capitalist roots have been forgotten. The
rank and file have largely come to terms with the logic of
exploitation, the cadres have been assimilated – and everyone is green.
They march hand in hand with nation and capital towards Brussels, waving
lobster and sickle at the economically marginalized classes left behind
in the deindustrialized regions and the oppressed in the rest of the
world, whom they wanted to liberate from misery and exploitation. And
these are just fragments of the recent German past, whose anti-fascist
narrative is peppered with contradictions, as the example of Hanns
Martin Schleyer shows.
Germany in autumn
It is hardly surprising
that fascism can be reanimated at any time. It does not suddenly rise
from the dead at parties on the island of Sylt or in a certain party. And
just because a few dummies are put in place to absorb the supposed
surprise effect, no mask will fall at a European election.
Fascism is
inherent in the system – and Germany is particularly susceptible to it
due to its historical preconceptions and its dealings with the Nazi era.
The
invocations of cross-class unity in response to the rise of a
right-wing party with an extremist nationalist wing that threatens
representative democracy in Germany – while the established and
capital-oriented parties defend it and the EU develops new methods to
repel refugees at the external borders or to lock them up in camps, and
the chorus calls for more security – make the general culture of
remembrance appear variable.
Since
the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany, fascism has been
prancing through parliaments, institutions and organizations in banker's
outfits. In
the "hot autumn" of 1977, the Bonn Republic took a very clear position
on how to deal with the legacy of fascism in connection with the
kidnapping and murder of the former SS officer and ideological warrior
of National Socialism, the President of the Employers' Association Hanns
Martin Schleyer, by the Red Army Faction (RAF) (1).
The
RAF, a revolutionary force in the armed struggle against imperialism,
wanted to force the release of the RAF members Andreas Bader, Irmgard
Möller, Jan-Carl Raspe and Gudrun Ensslin, who were imprisoned in
Stammheim prison. It kidnapped Schleyer on September 5, 1977, in order
to exchange him for the prisoners. On
October 13, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP)
hijacked the Landshut airplane, an action that was primarily seen as
support for the RAF (2).
The plane was stormed by the GSG9 on October 18, 1977 and the hostages were freed. On
the same day, the prisoners are said to have learned of the release of
the Landshut hostages and, according to official reports, committed
collective suicide. Doubts about the exact course of events on the
so-called "Night of Death at Stammheim" remain to this day. Baader,
Raspe and Ensslin were dead, Möller had several stab wounds in the upper
body, near the heart. She was seriously injured and survived.
The aftermath
The
prisoners' liberation had failed. Schleyer was shot by the RAF – a
completely senseless act of violence, morally reprehensible and
politically disastrous. The German left, significantly socialized in the
student movement and inspired by Marxist ideas, turned away from the
RAF and its goals. They
now stood by the nation, which mourned Schleyer, who had dug forced
laborers for tank construction in Czechoslovakia, the former
Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, for the Third Reich and had helped
to make the University of Innsbruck "Jew-free" at the beginning of his
career as head of the student union. (3,
4) After the war and three years of internment, he had left National
Socialism and the Order of the Skull behind him and had arrived in
democracy. In 1951, he started a new career with an automotive company.
In
public, the Nazi past was ignored and the memory of the business leader
and RAF victim Hanns Martin Schleyer was installed. The abbreviated
vita was well received. The nation was reborn in the form of the Federal
Republic of Germany and the new reality was complete: capitalism and
fascism were tangible even for the anti-capitalist left. In
1983, the SS man Schleyer was named after a multipurpose hall in
Stuttgart. Despite the current closing of ranks of democratic forces,
who are united against fascism, and their outcry before the European
elections, when a right-wing politician did not condemn the members of
the SS as criminals, the name of the Stuttgart hall was retained.
This
will certainly change, because in the capitalist and staunchly
anti-fascist nation that apparently wants to bless the whole world with
its triad of democracy, freedom and the market economy and pumps
billions into armament while poverty increases, Schleyer is no longer
needed as a victim of the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist struggle
of the RAF. The
torch of symbolism was passed on like a chalice of absolution – always
consistently bypassing the victims of the system, who are also
accumulating in the urban centers of Europe like slag in a blast
furnace.
A perspective
In
societies where material things are valued more highly than substance,
an evolutionary change in civilization that encompasses all subjects and
removes the ground from under the feet of the driving forces of
exploitation, greed and fascism is completely out of the question. The
goals of society as a whole are of no significance here, except when
the top of the economic pyramid benefits disproportionately.
Parliamentary activism therefore makes no sense, because the desired
change must be comprehensive.
To
eliminate the breeding ground of fascism means to cut off the
concentration of power like weeds close to the ground and to dig out the
roots. This means to disempower capital, to abolish its hierarchies and
the power of disposal over people realized by economic dependence and
to replace it by a culture of contradiction, by systems of
solution-oriented cooperation on the basis of common agreement,
arrangement and mutual empowerment and free decisions.
The
basis for this is an equal distribution of the surplus value generated
by society in order to fulfill the basic needs of all subjects and to
increase prosperity in general, while limiting the accumulation of
material wealth.
This approach is becoming inevitable due to the
dynamically advancing automation of production, which will eliminate the
dual function of man as producer and consumer, making him superfluous
from a capitalist point of view.
To
implement it, it requires an inner conviction and the willingness to
roll the stone around the mountain, which will move when it collapses
under its own weight.
Financial capitalism, which tries to escape
into regionally limited wars, digital currencies, armament, the trade in
greenhouse gases and organs, and into space, has reached its
qualitative and quantitative limits of growth. Capital
can no longer function according to its own logic because it can no
longer achieve anything meaningful or urgently necessary. It has to
appropriate all existing values such as real estate, farmland, water,
etc., but it still gets stuck because the ongoing pressure to grow
strangles it.
Due
to the global network of stock markets and banks and the mutual
penetration of capital in all countries, there is no realistic option to
escape a final breakdown. The domino effect exists at all levels. If
only one of the world's stock markets falls, all the others will follow
suit and the world economy will collapse. Any major war would
automatically mean the end of the known world.
The
chances of the economically marginalized and oppressed, whose numbers
are growing, are unfavorable because capital keeps them in check with
all its might. However, the starting situation can improve if, for
example, anarchism, which was involved in all the major revolutions, is
restored and fills the gap left by the political left with its wealth of
ideas. Once the void is filled, social power can emerge. The
challenge is to expose the cultural differences of the urban
underclasses as factually irrelevant and to agree on a common set of
values, in order to then organize, build structures such as labor
exchanges, supply centers and coupon systems, and unite the superfluous
productive forces, which are increasingly marginalized, under a common
social minimum goal: the radical elimination of poverty.
Sources and notes:
(1)
Straight Line Political Analysis: The RAF - #05 The Pawns Buback,
Ponto, Schleyer. On
https://www.youtube.com/@StraightLinePoliticalAnalysis (accessed on June
16, 2024).
(2) SWR2 Archivradio: Aircraft hijacking is linked to Schleyer kidnapping, October 14, 1977.
(3)
Kontext Wochenzeitung (18.10.2017): Der halbe Schleyer. On
https://www.kontextwochenzeitung.de/zeitgeschehen/342/der-halbe-schleyer-4658.html
(accessed on 16.6.2024).
(4)
DISSkursiv Weblog of the Duisburg Institute for Language and Social
Research (2010): "I am an old National Socialist and SS leader..." –
Hanns Martin Schleyer's Prague years; after: Erich Später – Villa
Waigner. Hanns Martin Schleyer and the German extermination elite in
Prague 1939-45 (Konkret Verlag, Hamburg 2009). At
http://www.disskursiv.de/2010/09/30/ich-bin-alter-nationalsozialist-und-ss-fuhrer-hanns-martin-schleyers-prager-jahre/
(accessed on 16.6.2024).
Gunther
Sosna studied psychology, sociology and sports science and has worked
in advertising, communications and as a journalist, among other things.
He is interested in the possibilities and limits of grassroots and
informal organization. He is the initiator of Neue Debatte – Magazin für
Journalismus und Wissenschaft von unten.
Read more
Related article
The flesh of others
The zombie movie "Land of the Dead" deals with a two-class society and the revolt of the lower classes against it.
19.07.2024 by Gunther Sosna
No comments:
Post a Comment